Second-order initial and boundary value problems
Problem 6.474 · medium
Solve \( \displaystyle 8 y + 6 y' + y'' = 0 \) with \( \displaystyle y(0) = 0,\ y'(0) = 2 \).
- \[ m^{2} + 6 m + 8 = \left(m + 2\right) \left(m + 4\right) \]The characteristic equation has distinct real roots -4 and -2.✓ Proved
- So y = C₁exp(-4*x) + C₂exp(-2*x); the two conditions fix C₁ and C₂.
- \[ 8 \left(e^{2 x} - 1\right) e^{- 4 x} + 6 \frac{d}{d x} \left(e^{2 x} - 1\right) e^{- 4 x} + \frac{d^{2}}{d x^{2}} \left(e^{2 x} - 1\right) e^{- 4 x} = 0 \]It satisfies the equation ...✓ Proved
- \[ \left. \left(e^{2 x} - 1\right) e^{- 4 x} \right|_{\substack{ x=0 }} = 0 \]... y(0) = 0 ...✓ Proved
- \[ \left. \frac{d}{d x} \left(e^{2 x} - 1\right) e^{- 4 x} \right|_{\substack{ x=0 }} = 2 \]y′(0) = 2.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = \left(e^{2 x} - 1\right) e^{- 4 x} \)
Lines: 4 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 2 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | finite differences of the answer satisfy the equation, and the conditions hold in floating point |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) — The solution verifies the final answer but fails to show the derivation of the constants C1 and C2 from the general solution. This skips the actual problem-solving process, teaching the student that verification is equivalent to solving.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) 2026-10-17 — The solution verifies the final answer but fails to show the derivation of the constants C1 and C2 from the general solution. This skips the actual problem-solving process, teaching the student that verification is equivalent to solving.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15 — The solution correctly identifies the general form of the solution and verifies that the stated answer satisfies both the differential equation and the initial conditions.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the characteristic roots and general form, and the provided specific solution satisfies both the differential equation and the initial conditions.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/second_order_ivp_bvp, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.