∫Calc Practice

Differential equations by direct integration

Problem 6.427 · easy

Solve \( \displaystyle y' = \frac{1}{x} \) with \( \displaystyle y(1) = 8 \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x \right)} = \frac{1}{x} \]
    Integrate: y = this + C.✓ Proved
  2. \[ 8 - \left. \ln{\left(x \right)} \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} = 8 \]
    y(1) = 8 fixes C.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \left. \ln{\left(x \right)} + 8 \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} = 8 \]
    The initial condition holds.✓ Proved
Answer \( y = \ln{\left(x \right)} + 8 \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0finite differences of the answer match f, and the initial value holds

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to explicitly state the general solution y = ln(x) + C before applying the initial condition, making the jump from the derivative check to the specific constant C=8 logically incomplete. Additionally, the notation 'Subs(log(x), x, 1)' in line 2 is ambiguous and does not clearly show the calculation 8 = ln(1) + C => C = 8.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-17 — The solution fails to explicitly state the general solution y = ln(x) + C before applying the initial condition, making the jump from the derivative check to the specific constant C=8 logically incomplete. Additionally, the notation 'Subs(log(x), x, 1)' in line 2 is ambiguous and does not clearly show the calculation 8 = ln(1) + C => C = 8.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The solution fails to explicitly state the general solution y = ln(x) + C before applying the initial condition. It jumps from the derivative check to verifying the final answer, omitting the crucial step of solving for the constant C (which is actually 8, not just added arbitrarily). While the final answer is correct, the logical flow presented in the sentences is incomplete and skips the derivation of the constant.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the general solution and applies the initial condition to find the constant. The final answer is correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The step that determines the constant C is incorrect. It states "8 - Subs(log(x), x, 1) = 8" which merely repeats the initial condition but does not solve for C. The correct deduction is log(1)+C=8 ⇒ C=8. The solution as written would mislead a student into thinking the constant is found by that subtraction.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/de_direct_integration, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.