∫Calc Practice

The logistic equation

Problem 6.386 · hard

A population follows the logistic model with growth rate \( \displaystyle r = \frac{1}{10} \) per year, carrying capacity 100, and initial population 20. Find \( \displaystyle P(t) \), \( \displaystyle P(3) \), and when the population reaches 50.
  1. Equilibria: P = 0 and P = K = 100. The solution has the form P = K/(1 + Ae^(−rt)) with A = (K − P₀)/P₀.
  2. \[ 4 \]
    A.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \frac{d}{d t} \frac{100}{1 + 4 e^{- \frac{t}{10}}} = \frac{10 - \frac{10}{1 + 4 e^{- \frac{t}{10}}}}{1 + 4 e^{- \frac{t}{10}}} \]
    This P(t) satisfies the differential equation.✓ Proved
  4. \[ 20 \]
    and the initial condition.✓ Proved
  5. \[ \frac{100}{1 + \frac{4}{e^{\frac{3}{10}}}} = \frac{100 e^{\frac{3}{10}}}{e^{\frac{3}{10}} + 4} \]
    P(3).✓ Proved
  6. \[ 10 \ln{\left(4 \right)} = \ln{\left(1048576 \right)} \]
    Half the carrying capacity when Ae^(−rt) = 1, i.e. t = ln(A)/r.✓ Proved
Answer \( P(t) = \frac{100}{1 + 4 e^{- \frac{t}{10}}},\ P(3) \approx 25.2,\ t = \ln{\left(1048576 \right)} \approx 13.863 \)

Lines: 5 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the differential equation solved numerically (Taylor-series ODE solver) from P(0)

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution claims t = ln(1048576) ≈ 13.863, but ln(1048576) ≈ 13.857. The value 13.863 corresponds to ln(1050000) or similar, not the exact express
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-12
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-12 — reviewer response could not be parsed: {"verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution claims t = ln(1048576) ≈ 13.863, but ln(1048576) ≈ 13.857. The value 13.863 corresponds to ln(1050000) or similar, not the exact express
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-12 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution incorrectly calculates the time to reach half the carrying capacity. It uses t = ln(A)/r, which yields t = 10 ln(4) ≈ 13.86, but the co
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-12

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/logistic_equation, checked 2026-10-12 with SymPy 1.14.0.