∫Calc Practice

Second-order linear equations

Problem 6.111 · hard

Solve \( \displaystyle y'' + 0y' + 4y = 0 \) with \( \displaystyle y(0) = -1,\ y'(0) = -3 \).
  1. Try y = e^(mx): the characteristic equation is m² + bm + c = 0.
  2. \[ \left(m - 2 i\right) \left(m + 2 i\right) = m^{2} + 4 \]
    Roots: -2*I, 2*I.✓ Proved
  3. Roots α ± βi give y = e^(αx)(C₁cos βx + C₂sin βx).
  4. Use y(0) and y'(0) to find C₁ and C₂.
  5. \[ - 6 \sin{\left(2 x \right)} - 4 \cos{\left(2 x \right)} + \frac{d^{2}}{d x^{2}} \left(- \frac{3 \sin{\left(2 x \right)}}{2} - \cos{\left(2 x \right)}\right) = 0 \]
    The solution satisfies the equation.✓ Proved
  6. \[ -1 \]
    y(0).✓ Proved
  7. \[ -3 \]
    y'(0).✓ Proved
Answer \( y = - \frac{3 \sin{\left(2 x \right)}}{2} - \cos{\left(2 x \right)} \)

Lines: 4 proved, 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
4Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0sympy.checkodesol substitutes the solution back; both initial conditions match

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution fails to explicitly derive the constants C1 and C2 from the initial conditions, jumping directly to the final answer without showing the necessary algebraic steps. While the final answer is correct, the logical flow is broken as the derivation of the specific solution is missing.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution fails to explicitly derive the constants C1 and C2 from the initial conditions, jumping directly to the final answer without showing the necessary algebraic steps. While the final answer is correct, the logical flow is broken as the derivation of the specific solution is missing.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution claims to find constants C1 and C2 but never shows the calculation or states the values found. It jumps from the general form to the final answer without demonstrating how the initial conditions were applied to determine the specific coefficients.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-09-26 — Sentence 5 incorrectly checks the differential equation; the expression shown does not correctly verify that y''+4y=0 for the proposed solution.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/second_order_linear, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.