∫Calc Practice

Volumes with known cross sections

Problem 5.323 · medium

The base of a solid is the region between \( \displaystyle y = 4 - x^{2} \) and the \( \displaystyle x \)-axis. Cross-sections perpendicular to the \( \displaystyle x \)-axis are equilateral triangles. Find the volume of the solid.
  1. \[ 4 - x^{2} \]
    At position x the base of the cross-section has length (top − bottom).✓ Proved
  2. \[ \frac{\sqrt{3} \left(4 - x^{2}\right)^{2}}{4} = \frac{\sqrt{3} x^{4}}{4} - 2 \sqrt{3} x^{2} + 4 \sqrt{3} \]
    Area of one cross-section: sqrt(3)/4·(side)².✓ Proved
  3. \[ \int\limits_{-2}^{2} \left(\frac{\sqrt{3} x^{4}}{4} - 2 \sqrt{3} x^{2} + 4 \sqrt{3}\right)\, dx = \frac{128 \sqrt{3}}{15} \]
    Volume = ∫ A(x) dx across the base.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{128 \sqrt{3}}{15} \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0numerical quadrature of the cross-sectional area

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the side length of the cross-sections, applies the area formula for equilateral triangles, and integrates over the correct bounds determined by the intersection of the parabola and the x-axis.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-07 — The solution correctly identifies the side length of the cross-sections, applies the area formula for equilateral triangles, and integrates over the correct bounds determined by the intersection of the parabola and the x-axis.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-07
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-07 — reviewer returned a non-object

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/volume_cross_sections, checked 2026-10-07 with SymPy 1.14.0.