∫Calc Practice

Integral of \( \displaystyle - 4 x + 3 \left(x - 1\right)^{2} + 5 \)

Problem 4.916 · medium

Find \( \displaystyle \int - 4 x + 3 \left(x - 1\right)^{2} + 5 \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
  1. \[ \int \left(- 4 x + 3 \left(x - 1\right)^{2} + 5\right)\, dx \]
    integralStart with the integral of the given expression.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \int \left(3 x^{2} - 10 x + 8\right)\, dx \]
    algebra algebra simplifyExpand the squared term. Distribute the 3. Combine like terms.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \int 8\, dx - \int 10 x\, dx + \int 3 x^{2}\, dx \]
    linearitySplit the integral into three parts.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = x^{3} - 5 x^{2} + 8 x \]
    antiderivativeIntegrate each term using the power rule.✓ Proved
Answer \( x \left(x^{2} - 5 x + 8\right) + C \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly expands, simplifies, and integrates the polynomial term by term. Each step applies a single rule from the allowed vocabulary, and the labels are accurate.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-12
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-12 — The solution correctly expands, simplifies, and integrates the polynomial term by term. Each step applies a single rule from the allowed vocabulary, and the labels are accurate.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-12
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-12

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-12 with SymPy 1.14.0.