Integral of \( \displaystyle 3 x e^{- 3 x} \)
Problem 4.731 · medium
Find \( \displaystyle \int 3 x e^{- 3 x} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
- \[ \int 3 x e^{- 3 x}\, dx \]integral algebraStart with the integral of the given function. Rearrange the integrand to prepare for integration by parts.✓ Proved
- \[ = - x e^{- 3 x} - \int \left(- e^{- 3 x}\right)\, dx \]partsApply integration by parts with u = x and dv = 3*exp(-3*x) dx.✓ Proved
- \[ = - x e^{- 3 x} + \int e^{- 3 x}\, dx \]algebraDistribute the negative sign and simplify the integral term.✓ Proved
- \[ = - x e^{- 3 x} - \frac{e^{- 3 x}}{3} \]antiderivativeEvaluate the remaining integral.✓ Proved
Answer \( \left(- x - \frac{1}{3}\right) e^{- 3 x} + C \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-09qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-09gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-09qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-09 — The solution correctly applies integration by parts and simplifies the result. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-09 with SymPy 1.14.0.