∫Calc Practice

Properties of definite integrals

Problem 4.497 · easy

Suppose \( \displaystyle \int_0^{3} f(x)\,dx = -9 \), \( \displaystyle \int_0^{2} f(x)\,dx = 1 \), \( \displaystyle \int_0^{3} g(x)\,dx = -1 \) and \( \displaystyle \int_0^{2} g(x)\,dx = 7 \). Find \( \displaystyle \int_{2}^{3} \left(f(x) + 2\right) dx \).
  1. The integral of a sum is the sum of the integrals, and constants factor out; ∫ from 2 to 3 = ∫ from 0 to 3 − ∫ from 0 to 2.
  2. \[ 1 \left(-10\right) + 0 \left(-8\right) + 2 \cdot 1 = -8 \]
    Combine the known values.✓ Proved
Answer \( -8 \)

Lines: 1 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. A reviewer's objection to the explanation stands; see the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0integrated concrete linear functions built to have the given integrals

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) — The second line is a garbled equation that does not correctly express the calculation: it mixes unrelated numbers (1, -10, 0, -8, 2) without explaining their origin. A clear derivation would be ∫₂³(f+2)=∫₀³f−∫₀²f+2(3−2)=(-9−1)+2=−8. The current statement could mislead a student about how the result is obtained.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer returned a non-object
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-06 — The second line is a garbled equation that does not correctly express the calculation: it mixes unrelated numbers (1, -10, 0, -8, 2) without explaining their origin. A clear derivation would be ∫₂³(f+2)=∫₀³f−∫₀²f+2(3−2)=(-9−1)+2=−8. The current statement could mislead a student about how the result is obtained.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-06 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-06 — The second sentence mixes unrelated numbers (1,0,2) with the integrals in a confusing way. It does not clearly explain how the value -8 is obtained, potentially misleading a student about the correct application of linearity and the constant term.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — The solution incorrectly calculates the integral of the constant 2 as 0 instead of 2*(3-2)=2. It also appears to use incorrect values for the integrals of f and g, leading to a wrong intermediate calculation.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/integral_properties, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.