∫Calc Practice

Integrals of absolute values

Problem 4.436 · easy

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-4}^{5} \left| - x^{2} + 2 x + 3 \right| dx \).
  1. \[ - x^{2} + 2 x + 3 = \left(3 - x\right) \left(x + 1\right) \]
    The integrand is zero at x = -1, x = 3.✓ Proved
  2. Between those zeros the sign does not change; where it is negative, |p(x)| = −p(x).
    Reviewed
  3. \[ \int\limits_{3}^{5} \left(x^{2} - 2 x - 3\right)\, dx + \int\limits_{-1}^{3} \left(- x^{2} + 2 x + 3\right)\, dx + \int\limits_{-4}^{-1} \left(x^{2} - 2 x - 3\right)\, dx = \frac{145}{3} \]
    Integrate each piece and add.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{145}{3} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0numerical quadrature of |p(x)|

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the roots of the quadratic, determines the sign of the integrand on the sub-intervals, and sets up the piecewise integration correctly. The final arithmetic is verified by the CAS.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-05 — The solution correctly identifies the roots of the quadratic, determines the sign of the integrand on the sub-intervals, and sets up the piecewise integration correctly. The final arithmetic is verified by the CAS.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-05
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-05 — The solution correctly identifies the roots of the quadratic, determines the sign of the integrand in each interval, and sets up the piecewise integration correctly. The final result is accurate.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-05

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/absolute_value_integral, checked 2026-10-05 with SymPy 1.14.0.