∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›u-substitution›Problem 4.266

Integral of \( \displaystyle \frac{2 x}{4 x^{2} + 1} \)

Problem 4.266 · medium

Find \( \displaystyle \int \frac{2 x}{4 x^{2} + 1} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
  1. \[ \int \frac{2 x}{4 x^{2} + 1}\, dx \]
    integral rewrite rewriteStart with the integral of the given function. Rewrite the denominator using a negative exponent. Rewrite the numerator to match the derivative of the denominator.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{\int \frac{8 x}{4 x^{2} + 1}\, dx}{4} \]
    linearityFactor out the constant 1/4.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{\ln{\left(4 x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{4} \]
    antiderivativeThe integral of (1/u)*du is log(u) where u = 4*x**2 + 1.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{\ln{\left(4 x^{2} + 1 \right)}}{4} + C \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 + 1 = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 + 1 = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 + 1 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*x**2 + 1 = 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies substitution logic via rewriting and linearity, with accurate labels for each step.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04 — The solution correctly applies substitution logic via rewriting and linearity, with accurate labels for each step.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-04
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-04 — Step 3 applies two transformations at once (rewriting the numerator and factoring a constant), violating the one‑rule‑per‑step rule.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.