Integral of \( \displaystyle e^{2 x - 1} \sin{\left(e^{2 x - 1} \right)} \)
Problem 4.257 · medium
Find \( \displaystyle \int e^{2 x - 1} \sin{\left(e^{2 x - 1} \right)} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
- \[ \int e^{2 x - 1} \sin{\left(e^{2 x - 1} \right)}\, dx \]integral algebraStart with the integral of the given function. Multiply and divide by 2 to prepare for substitution.✓ Proved
- \[ = \int \frac{\sin{\left(e^{2 x - 1} \right)} \frac{d}{d x} e^{2 x - 1}}{2}\, dx \]rewriteRewrite the integrand to highlight the derivative of the inner function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \int e^{2 x - 1} \sin{\left(e^{2 x - 1} \right)}\, dx \]simplify simplifySimplify the expression inside the integral. Simplify the constant factor.✓ Proved
- \[ = - \frac{\cos{\left(e^{2 x - 1} \right)}}{2} \]antiderivativeIntegrate using the substitution u = exp(2*x - 1), where du = 2*exp(2*x - 1)dx.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{\cos{\left(e^{2 x - 1} \right)}}{2} + C \)
Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) — Steps 2 through 5 are redundant and violate the 'one change per step' principle by performing trivial algebraic manipulations (multiplying/dividing by 2, rewriting derivative, simplifying) that do not constitute distinct logical progress. The solution could proceed directly from step 1 to step 6 via substitution.
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-04 — Steps 2 through 5 are redundant and violate the 'one change per step' principle by performing trivial algebraic manipulations (multiplying/dividing by 2, rewriting derivative, simplifying) that do not constitute distinct logical progress. The solution could proceed directly from step 1 to step 6 via substitution.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-04 — Step 3 introduces a derivative operator into the integrand, which is not algebraically equivalent to the previous step (which contained a constant factor 2). Step 4 then simplifies this derivative back to the original expression, making Steps 3 and 4 redundant and logically disjointed. The transition from Step 2 to Step 6 is valid via substitution, but the intermediate steps 3-5 are mathematically incoherent or redundant.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-04
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.