∫Calc Practice

Integral of \( \displaystyle 3 x^{2} - 4 x + 1 \)

Problem 4.195 · medium

Find \( \displaystyle \int 3 x^{2} - 4 x + 1 \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
  1. \[ \int \left(3 x^{2} - 4 x + 1\right)\, dx \]
    integralStart with the integral of the polynomial.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \int 1\, dx - \int 4 x\, dx + \int 3 x^{2}\, dx \]
    linearitySplit the integral into three separate terms.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \int 1\, dx - 4 \int x\, dx + 3 \int x^{2}\, dx \]
    linearityPull out the constant coefficients.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = x^{3} - 2 x^{2} + x \]
    antiderivative simplifyApply the power rule to each term. Simplify the coefficients.✓ Proved
Answer \( x \left(x - 1\right)^{2} + C \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-29
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-29 — The solution correctly applies linearity to split the integral and factor out constants, uses the power rule for antiderivatives, and simplifies the result. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-29 with SymPy 1.14.0.