Integral of \( \displaystyle \ln{\left(2 x \right)} \)
Problem 4.154 · easy
Find \( \displaystyle \int \ln{\left(2 x \right)} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
- \[ \int \ln{\left(2 x \right)}\, dx \]integralStart with the integral of the given function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \int \left(\ln{\left(x \right)} + \ln{\left(2 \right)}\right)\, dx \]algebraUse the logarithm product rule to split the term.✓ Proved
- \[ = \int \ln{\left(2 \right)}\, dx + \int \ln{\left(x \right)}\, dx \]linearitySplit the integral into two separate integrals.✓ Proved
- \[ = x \ln{\left(2 \right)} + \int \ln{\left(x \right)}\, dx \]antiderivativeThe integral of a constant is the constant times x.✓ Proved
- \[ = x \ln{\left(x \right)} + x \ln{\left(2 \right)} - \int 1\, dx \]partsUse integration by parts on the integral of log(x) with u=log(x) and dv=dx.✓ Proved
- \[ = x \ln{\left(x \right)} - x + x \ln{\left(2 \right)} \]antiderivativeEvaluate the integral of 1 with respect to x.✓ Proved
Answer \( x \ln{\left(2 x \right)} - x + C \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-29gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-29gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-29
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-29 with SymPy 1.14.0.