∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 2›Integration by parts›Problem 4.1442

Integral of \( \displaystyle \left(3 x - 1\right)^{2} e^{3 x - 1} \)

Problem 4.1442 · medium Video

Find \( \displaystyle \int \left(3 x - 1\right)^{2} e^{3 x - 1} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
  1. \[ \int \left(3 x - 1\right)^{2} e^{3 x - 1}\, dx \]
    integralStart with the integral of the given function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \int \left(9 x^{2} - 6 x + 1\right) e^{3 x - 1}\, dx \]
    algebraExpand the squared term.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - 6 \int x e^{3 x - 1}\, dx + 9 \int x^{2} e^{3 x - 1}\, dx + \int e^{3 x - 1}\, dx \]
    linearityDistribute the integral over the sum.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = 3 x^{2} e^{3 x - 1} - 9 \int \frac{2 x e^{3 x - 1}}{3}\, dx - 6 \int x e^{3 x - 1}\, dx + \int e^{3 x - 1}\, dx \]
    partsApply integration by parts to the first term.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = 3 x^{2} e^{3 x - 1} - 12 \int x e^{3 x - 1}\, dx + \int e^{3 x - 1}\, dx \]
    algebra algebraDistribute the 9 and simplify. Combine the integral terms.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = 3 x^{2} e^{3 x - 1} - 4 x e^{3 x - 1} + 12 \int \frac{e^{3 x - 1}}{3}\, dx + \int e^{3 x - 1}\, dx \]
    partsApply integration by parts to the second term.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = 3 x^{2} e^{3 x - 1} - 4 x e^{3 x - 1} + 5 \int e^{3 x - 1}\, dx \]
    algebra algebraDistribute the -12 and simplify. Combine the remaining integral terms.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = 3 x^{2} e^{3 x - 1} - 4 x e^{3 x - 1} + \frac{5 e^{3 x - 1}}{3} \]
    antiderivativeEvaluate the final integral.✓ Proved
  9. \[ = \left(3 x^{2} - 4 x + \frac{5}{3}\right) e^{3 x - 1} \]
    simplifyFactor out the exponential term.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{\left(9 x^{2} - 12 x + 5\right) e^{3 x - 1}}{3} + C \)
Top: the graph of F = (9x² - 12x + 5)·e^(3x - 1)/3. A tangent line slides along it, and its slope is plotted below as it goes, tracing f = (3x - 1)²·e^(3x - 1).

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-11-06
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-11-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-11-05 — The solution correctly applies integration by parts and algebraic simplification at each step. The labels accurately reflect the operations performed, and the final result matches the stated answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-11-05
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-11-05 — The solution correctly applies integration by parts and algebraic simplification at each step. The labels accurately reflect the operations performed, and the final result matches the stated answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-11-05

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-11-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.