∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›u-substitution›Problem 4.1427

Integral of \( \displaystyle 3 x \sqrt{1 - 9 x^{2}} \)

Problem 4.1427 · medium

Find \( \displaystyle \int 3 x \sqrt{1 - 9 x^{2}} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
  1. \[ \int 3 x \sqrt{1 - 9 x^{2}}\, dx \]
    integral simplify algebra substitutionStart with the integral of the given function. Rewrite the square root using exponent notation. Express 9*x**2 as (3*x)**2. Use substitution u = 1 - 9*x**2, where du = -18*x*dx.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{\left(1 - 9 x^{2}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{9} \]
    antiderivativeEvaluate the integral.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{\left(1 - 9 x^{2}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{9} + C \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 4 applies two rules at once: it rewrites the integrand using the substitution and simultaneously introduces the differential du, but the resulting expression is incorrect. The factor –18*x should not appear inside the integral after the substitution; the correct step would be –Integral(1/6*(1-9*x**2)**(1/2) du).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies substitution and integration rules. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-11-04 — The solution correctly applies substitution and integration rules. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-11-04 — Step 4 applies two rules at once: it rewrites the integrand using the substitution and simultaneously introduces the differential du, but the resulting expression is incorrect. The factor –18*x should not appear inside the integral after the substitution; the correct step would be –Integral(1/6*(1-9*x**2)**(1/2) du).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-11-03 — Step 4 applies the substitution rule but fails to change the variable of integration from x to u, leaving the integral in terms of x while introducing du components. Step 5 then incorrectly evaluates the integral without performing the variable change or back-substitution properly, resulting in a mathematically invalid transition.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-11-03
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-11-03 — Step 4 is not a valid single-step transformation under the 'substitution' rule; it attempts to rewrite the integrand to match a differential form without performing the actual variable change or integration. Furthermore, Step 5 incorrectly applies the antiderivative rule to the original variable expression without showing the substitution back or the integration of the u-form, effectively skipping the integration logic.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-11-03 — Step 4 applies two rules at once: it rewrites the integrand using the substitution u=1-9x^2 and simultaneously introduces an extra factor of (-18*x), which is incorrect. The correct substitution yields 3x dx = -du/6, so the integrand becomes -1/6 u^{1/2} du. The step’s label and algebra are therefore incorrect.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-11-04 with SymPy 1.14.0.