∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›u-substitution›Problem 4.1338

Integral of \( \displaystyle \sin{\left(2 x \right)} \cos^{3}{\left(2 x \right)} \)

Problem 4.1338 · medium Video

Find \( \displaystyle \int \sin{\left(2 x \right)} \cos^{3}{\left(2 x \right)} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
  1. \[ \int \sin{\left(2 x \right)} \cos^{3}{\left(2 x \right)}\, dx \]
    integral algebra substitution simplifyStart with the integral of the given function. Commute the factors. Recognize the derivative of cos(2*x) is -2*sin(2*x). Move the constant outside the integral.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{\cos^{4}{\left(2 x \right)}}{8} \]
    antiderivative simplifyIntegrate using the power rule for the substitution u = cos(2*x). Simplify the final expression.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \frac{\cos^{4}{\left(2 x \right)}}{8} + C \)
Top: the graph of F = -cos(2x)⁴/8. A tangent line slides along it, and its slope is plotted below as it goes, tracing f = sin(2x)·cos(2x)³.

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 4 claims to 'Move the constant outside the integral' but the constant -1/2 remains inside the integral in the expression, and the label 'simplify' does not describe moving a constant out. Step 5 jumps from an integral expression to a result without showing the integration step or properly handling the constant factor, effectively applying the antiderivative rule and constant multiple rule simultaneously or incorrectly.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-25 — Step 4 claims to 'Move the constant outside the integral' but the constant -1/2 remains inside the integral in the expression, and the label 'simplify' does not describe moving a constant out. Step 5 jumps from an integral expression to a result without showing the integration step or properly handling the constant factor, effectively applying the antiderivative rule and constant multiple rule simultaneously or incorrectly.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-25
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-24 — Step 4 is labeled 'simplify' but performs the operation of pulling a constant factor out of the integral (linearity). Step 3 is labeled 'substitution' but merely rewrites sin(2x) in terms of the derivative of cos(2x); the actual substitution (change of variable) is not performed until Step 5, making the label in Step 3 inaccurate for the transformation shown.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-24
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-24 — Step 4 is labeled 'simplify' but performs the operation of pulling a constant factor out of the integral, which is the 'linearity' rule. Step 3 is labeled 'substitution' but merely rewrites sin(2x) in terms of the derivative of cos(2x); the actual substitution change of variables is not performed until Step 5, making the label in Step 3 inaccurate (it should be 'rewrite' or 'algebra').
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-24

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-25 with SymPy 1.14.0.