∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 2›Partial fractions›Problem 4.1337

Integral of \( \displaystyle \frac{x - 1}{x \left(x + 2\right)} \)

Problem 4.1337 · medium Video

Find \( \displaystyle \int \frac{x - 1}{x \left(x + 2\right)} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
  1. \[ \int \frac{x - 1}{x \left(x + 2\right)}\, dx \]
    integralStart with the integral of the given function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \int \frac{x - 1}{x^{2} + 2 x}\, dx \]
    algebraExpand the denominator.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \int \left(\frac{1}{x + 2} - \frac{1}{x \left(x + 2\right)}\right)\, dx \]
    algebra algebra algebra algebraSplit the numerator into two terms. Rewrite the second term. Isolate the term 1/x. Prepare for partial fraction decomposition.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \int \left(\frac{1}{2 x + 4} + \frac{1}{x + 2} - \frac{1}{2 x}\right)\, dx \]
    algebraDistribute the term 1/x.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \int \left(\frac{3}{2 x + 4} - \frac{1}{2 x}\right)\, dx \]
    algebraCombine like terms.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = - \int \frac{1}{2 x}\, dx + \int \frac{3}{2 x + 4}\, dx \]
    linearitySplit the integral into two parts.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = - \frac{\ln{\left(x \right)}}{2} + \frac{3 \ln{\left(x + 2 \right)}}{2} \]
    antiderivativeIntegrate each term separately.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{- \ln{\left(x \right)} + 3 \ln{\left(x + 2 \right)}}{2} + C \)
Top: the graph of F = -log(x)/2 + 3log(x + 2)/2. A tangent line slides along it, and its slope is plotted below as it goes, tracing f = (x - 1)/(x·(x + 2)).

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where x + 2 = 0
undefined where x**2 + 2*x = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x**2 + 2*x = 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where x + 2 = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where x + 2 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where x + 2 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where x + 2 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where x + 2 = 0
undefined where 2*x + 4 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where 2*x + 4 = 0
undefined where x + 2 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0lines differ by the constant -3*log(2)/2
undefined where x = 0
undefined where 2*x + 4 = 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0lines differ by the constant 3*log(2)/2
undefined where x = 0
undefined where 2*x + 4 = 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 3 incorrectly rewrites (x-1)/(x*(x+2)) as 1/(x+2)-1/(x*(x+2)). The correct partial‑fraction decomposition is -1/(2x)+3/(2(x+2)), so the subsequent algebraic manipulations are based on a false identity.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-25
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-25 — Step 3 incorrectly rewrites (x-1)/(x*(x+2)) as 1/(x+2)-1/(x*(x+2)). The correct partial‑fraction decomposition is -1/(2x)+3/(2(x+2)), so the subsequent algebraic manipulations are based on a false identity.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-24
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-24 — Step 3 incorrectly rewrites (x-1)/(x*(x+2)) as 1/(x+2)+(-1)/(x*(x+2)). The correct partial‑fraction decomposition is -1/(2x)+3/(2(x+2)), so the subsequent steps are based on an incorrect algebraic manipulation.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-24 — The solution correctly applies algebraic manipulation to decompose the integrand into partial fractions and then integrates term by term. Each step applies a single rule and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-24 — Step 3 incorrectly rewrites the integrand; the correct partial‑fraction decomposition is \(\frac{x-1}{x(x+2)}=-\frac12\frac1x+\frac32\frac1{x+2}\). The subsequent algebraic manipulations are based on this wrong expression, so the solution is mathematically incorrect.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-25 with SymPy 1.14.0.