Integral of \( \displaystyle \frac{1}{\left(x - 1\right)^{2} - 4} \)
Problem 4.1247 · medium Video
Find \( \displaystyle \int \frac{1}{\left(x - 1\right)^{2} - 4} \, dx \). (Omit the constant of integration.)
- \[ \int \frac{1}{\left(x - 1\right)^{2} - 4}\, dx \]integralStart with the integral of the given function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \int \frac{1}{x^{2} - 2 x - 3}\, dx \]algebraExpand the squared term in the denominator.✓ Proved
- \[ = \int \frac{1}{\left(x - 3\right) \left(x + 1\right)}\, dx \]algebraFactor the quadratic expression in the denominator.✓ Proved
- \[ = \int \left(- \frac{1}{4 \left(x + 1\right)} + \frac{1}{4 \left(x - 3\right)}\right)\, dx \]partial-fractionsPerform partial fraction decomposition.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\int \frac{1}{x - 3}\, dx}{4} - \frac{\int \frac{1}{x + 1}\, dx}{4} \]linearitySplit the integral into two parts using linearity.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\ln{\left(x - 3 \right)}}{4} - \frac{\ln{\left(x + 1 \right)}}{4} \]antiderivativeIntegrate each term using the natural logarithm rule.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{\ln{\left(x - 3 \right)} - \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)}}{4} + C \)
Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where (x - 1)**2 - 4 = 0 undefined where x**2 - 2*x - 3 = 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x**2 - 2*x - 3 = 0 undefined where x + 1 = 0 undefined where x - 3 = 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x + 1 = 0 undefined where x - 3 = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x + 1 = 0 undefined where x - 3 = 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x + 1 = 0 undefined where x - 3 = 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated the stated antiderivative back to the integrand |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) — The final antiderivative omits the absolute‑value bars that are required for the logarithm terms, which could mislead a student into thinking the result is valid for all real x.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies algebraic manipulation, partial fraction decomposition, linearity of integration, and standard antiderivative rules. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly applies algebraic manipulation, partial fraction decomposition, linearity of integration, and standard antiderivative rules. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-10-19 — The final antiderivative omits the absolute‑value bars that are required for the logarithm terms, which could mislead a student into thinking the result is valid for all real x.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly applies algebraic manipulation, partial fraction decomposition, and linearity of integration. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly applies algebraic expansion, factoring, partial fraction decomposition, linearity of integration, and standard antiderivatives. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression and uses valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-16 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] The antiderivative of 1/(x‑3) and 1/(x+1) should be written with absolute values, i.e. ln|x‑3| and ln|x+1|. Omitting the absolute value signs can mislead a student into thinking the logarithm is defined for all real arguments.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-19 with SymPy 1.14.0.