Definite integrals from area formulas
Problem 4.1194 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-3}^{2} \left|{x}\right| \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
- The region between the graph and the x-axis is two triangles meeting at x = 0.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{2^{2}}{2} + \frac{3^{2}}{2} = \frac{13}{2} \]Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{-3}^{2} \left|{x}\right|\, dx = \frac{13}{2} \]Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{13}{2} \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shape as two triangles and calculates their areas. The phrasing 'signed area' in line 2 is slightly imprecise since absolute value yields positive area, but the calculation is correct and the final result matches the problem statement.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shape as two triangles and calculates their areas. The phrasing 'signed area' in line 2 is slightly imprecise since absolute value yields positive area, but the calculation is correct and the final result matches the problem statement.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shape as two triangles and calculates their areas accurately. The reference to '(signed) area' in line 2 is slightly imprecise terminology for the sum of absolute areas, but the calculation and final result are correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) 2026-10-15 — The solution claims the result is the '(signed) area', but the integral of |x| is strictly positive, whereas signed area can be negative. This conflates two distinct concepts and teaches incorrect terminology.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.