∫Calc Practice

Definite integrals from area formulas

Problem 4.1188 · easy Video

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-1}^{2} 2 x + 2 \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
  1. The region between the graph and the x-axis is a trapezoid (a triangle, since one side has height 0).
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \frac{\left(0 + 6\right) \left(1 + 2\right)}{2} = 9 \]
    Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \int\limits_{-1}^{2} \left(2 x + 2\right)\, dx = 9 \]
    Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( 9 \)
The graph of f(x) = 2x + 2 from x = -1 to x = 2. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 9.

Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0numerical quadrature

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately. The bounds and function values are correct.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately. The bounds and function values are correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid (specifically a right triangle since the function is zero at x=-1) and applies the area formula correctly. The bounds and heights are consistent with the function f(x) = 2x + 2.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-15 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.