Definite integrals from area formulas
Problem 4.1188 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-1}^{2} 2 x + 2 \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
- The region between the graph and the x-axis is a trapezoid (a triangle, since one side has height 0).Reviewed
- \[ \frac{\left(0 + 6\right) \left(1 + 2\right)}{2} = 9 \]Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{-1}^{2} \left(2 x + 2\right)\, dx = 9 \]Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( 9 \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately. The bounds and function values are correct.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately. The bounds and function values are correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid (specifically a right triangle since the function is zero at x=-1) and applies the area formula correctly. The bounds and heights are consistent with the function f(x) = 2x + 2.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-15 — reviewer returned a non-objectgpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-15
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.