∫Calc Practice

Definite integrals from area formulas

Problem 4.1144 · easy Video

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-2}^{3} \left|{x + 1}\right| \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
  1. The region between the graph and the x-axis is two triangles meeting at x = -1.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ \frac{1^{2}}{2} + \frac{4^{2}}{2} = \frac{17}{2} \]
    Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \int\limits_{-2}^{3} \left|{x + 1}\right|\, dx = \frac{17}{2} \]
    Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{17}{2} \)
The graph of f(x) = Abs(x + 1) from x = -2 to x = 3. Rectangles under the curve get thinner until they fill the area, 17/2.

✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0numerical quadrature

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles and calculates the result accurately.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles and calculates the result accurately.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles and computes the result accurately.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles with bases 1 and 4 and heights 1 and 4 respectively, leading to the correct result 17/2.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.