Definite integrals from area formulas
Problem 4.1144 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-2}^{3} \left|{x + 1}\right| \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
- The region between the graph and the x-axis is two triangles meeting at x = -1.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{1^{2}}{2} + \frac{4^{2}}{2} = \frac{17}{2} \]Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{-2}^{3} \left|{x + 1}\right|\, dx = \frac{17}{2} \]Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{17}{2} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles and calculates the result accurately.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles and calculates the result accurately.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles and computes the result accurately.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric interpretation of the integral as the sum of areas of two triangles with bases 1 and 4 and heights 1 and 4 respectively, leading to the correct result 17/2.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.