Definite integrals from area formulas
Problem 4.1074 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{-4}^{1} \left|{x + 1}\right| \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
- The region between the graph and the x-axis is two triangles meeting at x = -1.
- \[ \frac{2^{2}}{2} + \frac{3^{2}}{2} = \frac{13}{2} \]Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{-4}^{1} \left|{x + 1}\right|\, dx = \frac{13}{2} \]Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{13}{2} \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not checked | — | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) — The solution claims the area is '(signed) area', which is incorrect; the integral of an absolute value represents total geometric area, not signed area. Additionally, the setup in step 1 is vague and does not explicitly justify the dimensions of the triangles used in step 2.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) 2026-10-17 — The solution claims the area is '(signed) area', which is incorrect; the integral of an absolute value represents total geometric area, not signed area. Additionally, the setup in step 1 is vague and does not explicitly justify the dimensions of the triangles used in step 2.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric shapes (two triangles) and their dimensions based on the roots and bounds. The calculation of the areas is correct, and the final result matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the geometric decomposition into two triangles with bases 3 and 2, and heights 3 and 2 respectively, summing to 13/2.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.