Definite integrals from area formulas
Problem 4.1072 · easy Video
Evaluate \( \displaystyle \int_{2}^{4} 2 x + 4 \, dx \) using a formula from geometry.
- The region between the graph and the x-axis is a trapezoid.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{\left(-2 + 4\right) \left(8 + 12\right)}{2} = 20 \]Its (signed) area.✓ Proved
- \[ \int\limits_{2}^{4} \left(2 x + 4\right)\, dx = 20 \]Integrating directly gives the same.✓ Proved
Answer \( 20 \)
Lines: 2 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | numerical quadrature |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula with the correct heights and width. The result matches the direct integration.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-17 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula with the correct heights and width. The result matches the direct integration.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-14 — The solution claims the region is a trapezoid, but the function 2x+4 is negative at x=2 (value -4), meaning the region crosses the x-axis. The integral represents signed area, not the area of a single trapezoid. Using the trapezoid formula on the endpoints ignores the cancellation of positive and negative areas.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-14 — The solution correctly identifies the region as a trapezoid and applies the geometric area formula accurately to evaluate the definite integral.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/integral_geometry, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.