∫Calc Practice

Sums with sigma notation

Problem 4.1042 · medium

Evaluate \( \displaystyle \sum_{i=5}^{15} \left(- 2 i^{2} + 4 i + 6\right) \) using summation formulas.
  1. Split the sum and use Σᵢ₌₁ᴺ 1 = N, Σ i = N(N + 1)/2, Σ i² = N(N + 1)(2N + 1)/6, Σ i³ = [N(N + 1)/2]².
  2. The sum starts at i = 5: compute from 1 to 15 and subtract the sum from 1 to 4.
  3. \[ \left(-2\right) 15 \cdot 16 \cdot 31 \cdot 1 \cdot \frac{1}{6} + 6 \cdot 15 + 4 \cdot 15 \cdot 16 \cdot 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} = -1910 \]
    From i = 1 to 15.✓ Proved
  4. \[ \sum_{i=1}^{4} \left(- 2 i^{2} + 4 i + 6\right) = 4 \]
    From i = 1 to 4.✓ Proved
  5. \[ -1910 - 4 = -1914 \]
    Subtract.✓ Proved
  6. \[ \sum_{i=5}^{15} \left(- 2 i^{2} + 4 i + 6\right) = -1914 \]
    The sum, evaluated directly, agrees.✓ Proved
Answer \( -1914 \)

Lines: 4 proved, 2 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0the terms added one by one in Python integers

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution claims to use summation formulas but the equation in line 3 is algebraically incorrect for the sum from 1 to 15 (the term for the constant 6 is missing the factor of N, and the quadratic term is missing the factor of -2). While the final numerical result is correct, the intermediate step shown is false and misleading.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-17 — The solution claims to use summation formulas but the equation in line 3 is algebraically incorrect for the sum from 1 to 15 (the term for the constant 6 is missing the factor of N, and the quadratic term is missing the factor of -2). While the final numerical result is correct, the intermediate step shown is false and misleading.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-17
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-14 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-10-14 — reviewer response could not be parsed: { "verdict": "fail", "severity": "error", "notes": "The solution lists the formula for the sum of cubes (Σ i³) in step 1, but the problem only involves terms up to i². While not strictly an error in c
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-14

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/summation_formulas, checked 2026-10-17 with SymPy 1.14.0.