∫Calc Practice

The Mean Value Theorem and Rolle's theorem

Problem 3.448 · medium

Verify that \( \displaystyle f(x) = - x^{3} + x^{2} + x - 2 \) satisfies the hypotheses of the Mean Value Theorem on \( \displaystyle [1, 4] \), and find every number \( \displaystyle c \) the theorem guarantees.
  1. f is a polynomial, so it is continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b): the hypotheses hold.
  2. \[ - \frac{\left. - x^{3} + x^{2} + x - 2 \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }}}{3} + \frac{\left. - x^{3} + x^{2} + x - 2 \right|_{\substack{ x=4 }}}{3} = -15 \]
    The slope of the secant line.✓ Proved
  3. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x^{3} + x^{2} + x - 2\right) = - 3 x^{2} + 2 x + 1 \]
    Differentiate.✓ Proved
  4. \[ -15 \]
    c = 8/3 solves f′(c) = -15 and lies in (1, 4).✓ Proved
Answer \( c = \frac{8}{3} \)

Lines: 3 proved, 1 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0each c checked by a difference quotient; a scan of (a, b) finds no others

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The calculation of the secant slope is incorrect; the correct value is -13, not -15. Consequently, the derived value c = 8/3 is incorrect (the correct value is 7/3).
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — The calculation of the secant slope is incorrect; the correct value is -13, not -15. Consequently, the derived value c = 8/3 is incorrect (the correct value is 7/3).
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-06
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-06 — The calculation of the secant slope in line 2 is incorrect; the formula used is invalid and yields -15 instead of the correct value -11. Consequently, the equation solved in line 4 is wrong, leading to an incorrect value for c.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/mean_value_theorem, checked 2026-10-06 with SymPy 1.14.0.