Linear approximation
Problem 3.30 · easy
Use the linear approximation of \( \displaystyle f(x) = \ln{\left(x \right)} \) at \( \displaystyle x = 1 \) to estimate \( \displaystyle f(\frac{27}{25}) \).
- The linearization at a is L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x − a).Reviewed
- \[ \left. \ln{\left(x \right)} \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} = 0 \]f(a).✓ Proved
- \[ \left. \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x \right)} \right|_{\substack{ x=1 }} = 1 \]f'(a).✓ Proved
- \[ x - 1 \]The linearization.Reviewed
- \[ \frac{2}{25} \]Evaluate at x = \frac{27}{25}.Reviewed
Answer \( L(\frac{27}{25}) = \frac{2}{25} \approx 0.08 \)
Lines: 2 proved, 3 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | a sentence; read, not computed |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line |
| 5 | Reviewed | reviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlx | both sides are the same expression: the line states a value, and the working that produced it is not on the line |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Checked independently | sympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0 | the estimate is within Taylor's error bound of the true value |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly identifies the linearization formula, computes the derivative and function value at x=1, constructs the linear approximation L(x) = x-1, and evaluates it at x=27/25 to get 2/25. All steps are logically sound and algebraically correct.
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-28 — The solution correctly identifies the linearization formula, computes the derivative and function value at x=1, constructs the linear approximation L(x) = x-1, and evaluates it at x=27/25 to get 2/25. All steps are logically sound and algebraically correct.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-28qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — The solution fails to explicitly construct the linearization formula L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) using the computed values f(1)=0 and f'(1)=1. It jumps from the derivatives to the final evaluation without showing the intermediate step L(x) = x - 1, making the logic incomplete.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — Line 4 is labeled 'The linearization' but contains only the term (x-1), omitting the f(a) term. Although f(a)=0 makes the final result correct, the statement that L(x) = x-1 is technically incorrect notation for the linearization function, which should be explicitly written as L(x) = 0 + 1(x-1) or simply L(x) = x-1 with the derivation shown. More critically, line 4 is marked as an equation 'x - 1, x - 1' which is a tautology, not the definition of L(x). The sentence in line 1 defines L(x), but line 4 fails to state L(x) = x - 1, instead just presenting the expression. This is a structural error in the solution presentation.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
generator:structured/linear_approximation, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.