∫Calc Practice

Absolute extrema on a closed interval

Problem 3.204 · medium

Find the absolute maximum and minimum values of \( \displaystyle f(x) = - x^{3} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 18 x - 2 \) on \( \displaystyle [-2, 3] \).
  1. A continuous function on a closed interval has its extreme values at critical points or endpoints.
  2. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x^{3} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 18 x - 2\right) = \left(9 - 3 x\right) \left(x + 2\right) \]
    Differentiate and factor.✓ Proved
  3. Critical numbers inside [-2, 3]: none.
  4. \[ \left. - x^{3} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 18 x - 2 \right|_{\substack{ x=-2 }} = -24 \]
    f(-2).✓ Proved
  5. \[ \left. - x^{3} + \frac{3 x^{2}}{2} + 18 x - 2 \right|_{\substack{ x=3 }} = \frac{77}{2} \]
    f(3).✓ Proved
  6. The largest value is 77/2 and the smallest is -24.
Answer \( \text{max } \frac{77}{2} \text{ at } x=3;\ \text{min } -24 \text{ at } x=-2 \)

Lines: 3 proved, 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
6Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0f sampled at 40,001 points across the interval reaches the same max and min

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 3 incorrectly claims there are no critical numbers inside the interval. The derivative factors as -3(x-3)(x+2), yielding critical points at x=3 and x=-2. While these are endpoints, the statement 'none' is technically false regarding the set of critical numbers in the closed interval, and it ignores that x=3 is a critical point where the maximum occurs.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — Step 3 incorrectly claims there are no critical numbers inside the interval. The derivative factors as -3(x-3)(x+2), yielding critical points at x=3 and x=-2. While these are endpoints, the statement 'none' is technically false regarding the set of critical numbers in the closed interval, and it ignores that x=3 is a critical point where the maximum occurs.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-09-26 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/absolute_extrema, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.