∫Calc Practice

Absolute extrema on a closed interval

Problem 3.141 · hard Video

Find the absolute maximum and minimum values of \( \displaystyle f(x) = - x^{3} + 12 x + 1 \) on \( \displaystyle [-2, 4] \).
  1. A continuous function on a closed interval has its extreme values at critical points or endpoints.
  2. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- x^{3} + 12 x + 1\right) = \left(6 - 3 x\right) \left(x + 2\right) \]
    Differentiate and factor.✓ Proved
  3. Critical numbers inside [-2, 4]: 2.
  4. \[ \left. - x^{3} + 12 x + 1 \right|_{\substack{ x=-2 }} = -15 \]
    f(-2).✓ Proved
  5. \[ \left. - x^{3} + 12 x + 1 \right|_{\substack{ x=2 }} = 17 \]
    f(2).✓ Proved
  6. \[ \left. - x^{3} + 12 x + 1 \right|_{\substack{ x=4 }} = -15 \]
    f(4).✓ Proved
  7. The largest value is 17 and the smallest is -15.
Answer \( \text{max } 17 \text{ at } x=2;\ \text{min } -15 \text{ at } x=-2 \)
The graph of f(x) = -x³ + 12x + 1 on [-2, 4]. The candidates are the endpoints and the critical points inside; the highest is 17 and the lowest -15.

Lines: 4 proved, 3 not checked. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
7Not checked—a sentence; read, not computed
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0f sampled at 40,001 points across the interval reaches the same max and min

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive — reviewer returned a non-object
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-09-28 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-28
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: inconclusive 2026-09-27 — reviewer returned a non-object
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-27
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — The solution fails to evaluate the function at the endpoint x=4, which yields -15. While the final minimum value is correct, the reasoning is incomplete because it ignores a boundary point that achieves the minimum, potentially misleading students about the necessity of checking all endpoints.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-09-26 — The solution states the minimum occurs only at x = –2, but f(4) also equals –15, so the conclusion about the location of the minimum is incomplete.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/absolute_extrema, checked 2026-09-28 with SymPy 1.14.0.