∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Quotient rule›Problem 2.847

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{5 \ln{\left(\ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{3} \)

Problem 2.847 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{5 \ln{\left(\ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{3} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{5 \ln{\left(\ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{3} \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{5 \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(\ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{3} \]
    constant-multiple rewrite simplifyPull out the constant factor. Rewrite the inner log for clarity. Simplify the expression.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{5 \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)}}{3 \ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the outer logarithm.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{5 \frac{d}{d x} \left(3 x - 3\right)}{3 \left(3 x - 3\right) \ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the inner logarithm.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{5}{\left(3 x - 3\right) \ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)}} \]
    derivative algebra simplifyDifferentiate the innermost linear function. Multiply the terms together. Cancel the 3 in the numerator and denominator.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{5}{\left(3 x - 3\right) \ln{\left(3 x - 3 \right)}} \)
Mind the domain. The answer is also defined on (1, 4/3), where f(x) is not. Substituting there gives a number that is not a slope of f.

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where log(3*x - 3) = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where log(3*x - 3) = 0
undefined where 3*x - 3 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where log(3*x - 3) = 0
undefined where 3*x - 3 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where log(3*x - 3) = 0
undefined where 3*x - 3 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where log(3*x - 3) = 0
undefined where 3*x - 3 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where log(3*x - 3) = 0
undefined where 3*x - 3 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) — Step 9 claims to cancel a 3 in the numerator and denominator, but after step 8 the expression is already 5/(log(3*x-3)*(3*x-3)) with no remaining factor of 3 to cancel. This misleads the reader about the algebraic simplification performed.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (misleading) 2026-09-26 — Step 9 claims to cancel a 3 in the numerator and denominator, but after step 8 the expression is already 5/(log(3*x-3)*(3*x-3)) with no remaining factor of 3 to cancel. This misleads the reader about the algebraic simplification performed.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26 — The solution correctly applies the constant multiple rule, chain rule, and derivative rules in a logical sequence. The intermediate rewrite and simplify steps (3 and 4) are redundant but do not constitute a defect as they are algebraically valid and do not violate the single-rule-per-step constraint.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.