Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \cos{\left(x + 1 \right)} \)
Problem 2.845 · easy Video
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \cos{\left(x + 1 \right)}\right) \]derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = - \frac{d}{d x} \cos{\left(x + 1 \right)} \]constantPull the constant -1 out of the derivative.✓ Proved
- \[ = \sin{\left(x + 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + 1\right) \]trig algebraApply the derivative rule for cosine and the chain rule. Simplify the signs.✓ Proved
- \[ = \sin{\left(x + 1 \right)} \]derivative simplifyDifferentiate the inner function x + 1. Final simplification.✓ Proved
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 3 applies both the cosine derivative (trig) and the chain rule in one move, violating the rule‑by‑rule granularity requirement. The correct labeling would need two separate steps: one for the trig derivative and one for the chain rule.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 3 applies both the trigonometric derivative rule and the chain rule in a single step, violating the one-rule-per-step constraint. It should be split into a step applying the chain rule to cos(u) and a subsequent step applying the derivative of cosine.
Senior review claude-sonnet-5-5, 2026-10-13: pass — The derivative of -cos(x+1) is sin(x+1), and every step is correct and checked by SymPy. The rule labels (derivative, constant, trig, algebra, derivative, simplify) each name a rule that was applied, and the steps change one thing at a time.
gpt-oss:20b: dismiss — Differentiating cos(u) and applying the chain rule with the inner derivative left as Derivative(x+1, x) is one change; the contract treats this as a single step, and 'trig' names a rule that was legitimately applied.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: dismiss — Applying the cosine derivative together with the chain-rule wrapper is one rule application on one term, so no real two-change defect exists, and the label 'trig' is legitimate.
Every verdict on record (7)
claude-sonnet-5-5: pass 2026-10-13 — The derivative of -cos(x+1) is sin(x+1), and every step is correct and checked by SymPy. The rule labels (derivative, constant, trig, algebra, derivative, simplify) each name a rule that was applied, and the steps change one thing at a time.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — Step 3 applies both the trigonometric derivative rule and the chain rule in a single step, violating the one-rule-per-step constraint. It should be split into a step applying the chain rule to cos(u) and a subsequent step applying the derivative of cosine.gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-27 — Step 3 applies both the cosine derivative (trig) and the chain rule in one move, violating the rule‑by‑rule granularity requirement. The correct labeling would need two separate steps: one for the trig derivative and one for the chain rule.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-09-26 — Step 3 applies both the trigonometric derivative rule and the chain rule simultaneously, violating the one-rule-per-step constraint. It should be split into a step applying the chain rule to cos(u) and a subsequent step applying the trig derivative.gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-26 — Step 3 applies both the cosine derivative rule and the chain rule in a single line, violating the rule‑by‑rule granularity requirement. It should be split into two separate steps, each with an appropriate label.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-27 with SymPy 1.14.0.