Derivative of \( \displaystyle 2 \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} \)
Problem 2.686 · medium Mental math
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = 2 \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} 2 \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} \]Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = 2 \frac{d}{d x} \operatorname{atan}{\left(x \right)} \]constant-multiplePull the constant out of the derivative.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{2}{x^{2} + 1} \]derivative simplifyApply the derivative rule for arctan(x). Simplify the expression.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{2}{x^{2} + 1} \)
Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x**2 + 1 = 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where x**2 + 1 = 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21 — The solution correctly applies the constant multiple rule and the derivative of arctan, with appropriate labels and single-rule steps.gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-21 — Step 1 has no rule label and does not change anything; it should be labeled as a derivative application (or omitted).
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.