∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Quotient rule›Problem 2.670

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{2 \operatorname{atan}{\left(5 x \right)}}{5} \)

Problem 2.670 · medium

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{2 \operatorname{atan}{\left(5 x \right)}}{5} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{2 \operatorname{atan}{\left(5 x \right)}}{5} \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{2 \frac{d}{d x} \operatorname{atan}{\left(5 x \right)}}{5} \]
    constant-multiplePull out the constant factor.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{2 \frac{d}{d x} 5 x}{5 \left(25 x^{2} + 1\right)} \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the arctangent function.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{2}{25 x^{2} + 1} \]
    power algebraDifferentiate the inner function 5*x. Simplify the expression by canceling the 5.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{2}{25 x^{2} + 1} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 25*x**2 + 1 = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 25*x**2 + 1 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 25*x**2 + 1 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 25*x**2 + 1 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 4 applies two transformations—simplifying (5*x)**2 to 25*x**2 and multiplying by 5—yet it is labeled only as "power". The label should reflect the simplification or the derivative of the inner function, not both at once.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) — Step 4 is labeled 'power', but the operation performed is differentiating a linear term (5*x), which is a basic derivative rule, not the power rule. The label should be 'derivative'.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-09-21 — Step 4 is labeled 'power', but the operation performed is differentiating a linear term (5*x), which is a basic derivative rule, not the power rule. The label should be 'derivative'.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-21 — Step 4 applies two transformations—simplifying (5*x)**2 to 25*x**2 and multiplying by 5—yet it is labeled only as "power". The label should reflect the simplification or the derivative of the inner function, not both at once.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21 — The solution correctly applies the constant multiple rule, chain rule, and power rule in separate steps. The labels accurately reflect the operations performed, and the algebraic simplification is correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-21 — Step 4 incorrectly labels the differentiation of 5*x as "power"; it should be "constant-multiple" or simply "derivative". The algebraic simplification in step 5 is fine.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.