Derivative of \( \displaystyle 2 x \left(25 x^{2} + 30 x + 12\right) \)
Problem 2.646 · hard
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = 2 x \left(25 x^{2} + 30 x + 12\right) \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} 2 x \left(25 x^{2} + 30 x + 12\right) \]Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{d}{d x} \left(50 x^{3} + 60 x^{2} + 24 x\right) \]algebraDistribute the 2*x into the parentheses.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{d}{d x} 24 x + \frac{d}{d x} 60 x^{2} + \frac{d}{d x} 50 x^{3} \]sumApply the sum rule for derivatives.✓ Proved
- \[ = 24 \frac{d}{d x} x + 60 \frac{d}{d x} x^{2} + 50 \frac{d}{d x} x^{3} \]constant-multiplePull out the constant coefficients.✓ Proved
- \[ = 150 x^{2} + 120 x + 24 \]power simplifyApply the power rule to each term. Multiply the constants to get the final result.✓ Proved
Answer \( 6 \left(5 x + 2\right)^{2} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21 — The solution correctly expands the polynomial, applies the sum and constant multiple rules, and uses the power rule to differentiate each term. All steps adhere to the single-change constraint and use valid labels.gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-21 — [domain objection, downgraded to style] Step 1 uses an undefined label "unlabelled"; it should be labeled with an appropriate rule such as "derivative" or "algebra".
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.