∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Chain rule›Problem 2.629

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{\sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{3} \)

Problem 2.629 · medium Video

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{\sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{3} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{\sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{3}\right) \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{3} \]
    constant-multiple rewritePull out the constant factor. Rewrite the square root as a fractional exponent.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1\right)}{6 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(3 x + 1\right)^{2}}{6 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    sumDifferentiate the sum inside the parentheses.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = - \frac{\left(6 x + 2\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(3 x + 1\right)}{6 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    powerApply the power rule to the squared term.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = - \frac{18 x + 6}{6 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    derivative constant-multipleDifferentiate the linear term. Multiply the constants.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{- 3 x - 1}{\sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    simplifySimplify the expression.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{- 3 x - 1}{\sqrt{\left(3 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \)
Top: the graph of f = -sqrt((3x + 1)² + 1)/3. A tangent line slides along it, and its slope is plotted below as it goes, tracing f' = -(9x + 3)/(3sqrt((3x + 1)² + 1)).

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass

Senior review claude-sonnet-5-5, 2026-10-11: pass — The derivation is correct and each line is proved equal to the previous one. Labels are acceptable; folding -1/3*1/2 into -1/6 during the sum step is trivial arithmetic, not an independent change.

  • unnamed panel model: dismiss — The only panel entry is a note that one model both passed and objected, with no specific defect stated, and SymPy proved every line and the final answer.
Every verdict on record (7)
  • claude-sonnet-5-5: pass 2026-10-11 — The derivation is correct and each line is proved equal to the previous one. Labels are acceptable; folding -1/3*1/2 into -1/6 during the sum step is trivial arithmetic, not an independent change.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-21 — Step 5 applies the sum rule but omits the derivative of the constant term +1. The correct derivative of ((3*x+1)**2 + 1) is 2*(3*x+1)*3 + 0, not just 2*(3*x+1)*3.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.