∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Quotient rule›Problem 2.586

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{2} \sqrt{x}}{2 x + 1} \)

Problem 2.586 · hard Video

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{2} \sqrt{x}}{2 x + 1} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sqrt{2} \sqrt{x}}{2 x + 1} \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \sqrt{2} \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sqrt{x}}{2 x + 1} \]
    constant-multiple rewritePull out the constant factor sqrt(2). Rewrite the denominator using a negative exponent.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \sqrt{2} \left(\sqrt{x} \frac{d}{d x} \frac{1}{2 x + 1} + \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{x}}{2 x + 1}\right) \]
    productApply the product rule.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \sqrt{2} \left(- \frac{\sqrt{x} \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x + 1\right)}{\left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}} + \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{x}}{2 x + 1}\right) \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the second term.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \sqrt{2} \left(- \frac{2 \sqrt{x}}{\left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}} + \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{x}}{2 x + 1}\right) \]
    derivative constant-multipleDifferentiate the inner function 2x + 1. Simplify the second term's constant.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \sqrt{2} \left(- \frac{2 \sqrt{x}}{\left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}} + \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x} \left(2 x + 1\right)}\right) \]
    derivative algebraDifferentiate sqrt(x). Simplify the expression.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{\sqrt{2} \left(1 - 2 x\right)}{2 \sqrt{x} \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}} \]
    algebra algebra algebra simplifyFind a common denominator. Simplify the numerator. Combine like terms. Final simplified form.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{\sqrt{2} \left(\frac{1}{2} - x\right)}{\sqrt{x} \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}} \)
Top: the graph of f = sqrt(2)·sqrt(x)/(2x + 1). A tangent line slides along it, and its slope is plotted below as it goes, tracing f' = -2sqrt(2)·sqrt(x)/(2x + 1)² + sqrt(2)/(2sqrt(x)·(2x + 1)).

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
undefined where x = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where x = 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
undefined where x = 0
12✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
undefined where x = 0
13✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
undefined where x = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 2*x + 1 = 0
undefined where x = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications in single-step increments. The labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-26 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications in single-step increments. The labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-26
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21 — The solution correctly applies the constant multiple, rewrite, product, and chain rules in distinct steps. The algebraic simplification steps are valid and lead to the correct final answer.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.