∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Product rule›Problem 2.478

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{\left(3 \sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - 3 \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) e^{4 x - 1}}{8} \)

Problem 2.478 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{3 \left(\sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) e^{4 x - 1}}{8} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\left(3 \sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - 3 \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) e^{4 x - 1}}{8} \]
    constant-multiplePull out the constant factor.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{3 \frac{d}{d x} \left(\sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) e^{4 x - 1}}{8} \]
    productApply the product rule.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{3 \left(\sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) \frac{d}{d x} e^{4 x - 1}}{8} + \frac{3 e^{4 x - 1} \frac{d}{d x} \left(\sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right)}{8} \]
    sumDifferentiate the terms in the subtraction.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{3 \left(\sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) \frac{d}{d x} e^{4 x - 1}}{8} + \frac{3 \left(\frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - \frac{d}{d x} \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) e^{4 x - 1}}{8} \]
    trigDifferentiate sine and cosine.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{3 \left(4 \sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} - 4 \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) e^{4 x - 1}}{8} + \frac{3 \left(4 \sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} + 4 \cos{\left(4 x - 1 \right)}\right) e^{4 x - 1}}{8} \]
    exponential algebraDifferentiate the exponential function. Simplify the signs.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = 3 e^{4 x - 1} \sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} \]
    algebra simplify simplifyDistribute the exponential term. Combine like terms. Final simplification.✓ Proved
Answer \( 3 e^{4 x - 1} \sin{\left(4 x - 1 \right)} \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-09-20 — Step 3 is labeled 'sum' but performs differentiation of the terms inside the derivative operator, which is not what the 'sum' rule (linearity of differentiation) alone does; it conflates the application of the derivative operator with the sum rule. More critically, Step 4 is labeled 'trig' but applies the chain rule to differentiate sin(4x-1) and cos(4x-1), which is a defect because 'chain' is the required label for differentiating composite trigonometric functions. Step 5 is labeled 'exponential' but also applies the chain rule to exp(4x-1), missing the 'chain' label.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-20 — Step 5 applies three derivative rules at once (for sin, cos, and exp) and is labeled incorrectly as "exponential". This violates the one‑rule‑per‑step rule and mislabels the operation.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint. The labels accurately describe the operations performed, and the final result is correct.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-09-20 — Step 5 applies two differentiation rules at once (trigonometric and exponential) but is labeled only as "exponential". Each step must change only one thing and use a single rule label.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.