∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Power rule›Problem 2.452

Derivative of \( \displaystyle x \left(x + 2\right) \)

Problem 2.452 · medium

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = x \left(x + 2\right) \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} x \left(x + 2\right) \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} \left(x^{2} + 2 x\right) \]
    algebraExpand the expression first.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{d}{d x} 2 x + \frac{d}{d x} x^{2} \]
    sumApply the sum rule.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = 2 x + \frac{d}{d x} 2 x \]
    powerDifferentiate the first term using the power rule.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = 2 x + 2 \]
    constant-multipleDifferentiate the second term by pulling out the constant.✓ Proved
Answer \( 2 x + 2 \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-21
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly expands the function before differentiating, applying one rule per step with accurate labels and notes.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-09-20 — Step 5 applies two rules at once: it differentiates x (derivative/power) and pulls out the constant 2 (constant-multiple). The step should be split or labeled to reflect that differentiation occurred, not just constant extraction.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.