Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \)
Problem 2.42 · medium
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \]Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \]constant-multiple rewritePull out the constant factor 1/4. Rewrite the square root as a fractional power.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1\right)}{8 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]chainApply the chain rule.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} 1 + \frac{d}{d x} 4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}}{8 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]sumApply the sum rule to the inner derivative.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} 4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}}{8 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]constant algebraThe derivative of the constant 1 is 0. Simplify the expression.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}}{2 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]constant-multiple algebraPull out the constant factor 4 from the derivative. Simplify the coefficients (4/8 = 1/2).✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\left(4 x + 2\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x + 1\right)}{2 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]chainApply the chain rule to the power function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{8 x + 4}{2 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]derivative algebraThe derivative of 2x + 1 is 2. Multiply the constants.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{4 x + 2}{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]algebra rewrite algebraSimplify the coefficients (1/2 * 4 = 2). Rewrite the negative exponent as a denominator. Distribute the 2 into the parentheses.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{2 \left(2 x + 1\right)}{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 10 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 11 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 12 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 13 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 14 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| 15 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passdeepseek-r1:70b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (12)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint. The final answer is algebraically equivalent to the stated answer, and the steps are logically sound.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-17deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-17
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.