∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Power rule›Problem 2.42

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \)

Problem 2.42 · medium

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}}{4} \]
    constant-multiple rewritePull out the constant factor 1/4. Rewrite the square root as a fractional power.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1\right)}{8 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} 1 + \frac{d}{d x} 4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}}{8 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    sumApply the sum rule to the inner derivative.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} 4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}}{8 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    constant algebraThe derivative of the constant 1 is 0. Simplify the expression.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2}}{2 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    constant-multiple algebraPull out the constant factor 4 from the derivative. Simplify the coefficients (4/8 = 1/2).✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{\left(4 x + 2\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x + 1\right)}{2 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule to the power function.✓ Proved
  8. \[ = \frac{8 x + 4}{2 \sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    derivative algebraThe derivative of 2x + 1 is 2. Multiply the constants.✓ Proved
  9. \[ = \frac{4 x + 2}{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    algebra rewrite algebraSimplify the coefficients (1/2 * 4 = 2). Rewrite the negative exponent as a denominator. Distribute the 2 into the parentheses.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{2 \left(2 x + 1\right)}{\sqrt{4 \left(2 x + 1\right)^{2} + 1}} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
12✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
13✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
14✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
15✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 4*(2*x + 1)**2 + 1 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (12)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step, adhering to the one-change-per-step constraint. The final answer is algebraically equivalent to the stated answer, and the steps are logically sound.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-17
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-17

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.