∫Calc Practice

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{3 \cos{\left(5 x + 1 \right)}}{5} \)

Problem 2.388 · medium

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{3 \cos{\left(5 x + 1 \right)}}{5} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{3 \cos{\left(5 x + 1 \right)}}{5}\right) \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{3 \frac{d}{d x} \cos{\left(5 x + 1 \right)}}{5} \]
    constant-multiplePull out the constant factor.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{3 \sin{\left(5 x + 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(5 x + 1\right)}{5} \]
    trigApply the derivative rule for cosine.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = 3 \sin{\left(5 x + 1 \right)} \]
    chain algebraApply the chain rule to the inner function. Simplify the expression by multiplying the constants.✓ Proved
Answer \( 3 \sin{\left(5 x + 1 \right)} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) — Step 3 applies the chain rule (differentiating the inner function) but is labeled 'trig'. Step 4 is labeled 'chain' but only differentiates the linear inner function, which is a basic derivative, not the chain rule application itself. The labels are swapped or misapplied.
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-09-21 — Step 3 applies the chain rule (differentiating the inner function) but is labeled 'trig'. Step 4 is labeled 'chain' but only differentiates the linear inner function, which is a basic derivative, not the chain rule application itself. The labels are swapped or misapplied.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-21
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-09-20 — Step 3 is labeled 'trig' but actually applies the chain rule to differentiate the composite function cos(5x+1). Step 4 is labeled 'chain' but only differentiates the inner linear function, which is a basic derivative rule, not the chain rule itself. The labels for the chain rule application are swapped/misapplied.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-09-20 — Step 3 is labeled 'trig' but applies the chain rule (Derivative(cos(u)) = -sin(u)*u'), which is a defect in labeling. Step 4 is labeled 'chain' but only computes the derivative of the inner linear function, which is a 'derivative' step, not the chain rule itself.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-20 — Step 4 incorrectly labels the application of the derivative of the linear inner function as "chain"; it should be "constant-multiple".

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.