Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{x^{2}}{2} + x + \left(x^{2} - 2 x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \)
Problem 2.2462 · hard Video
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{x^{2}}{2} + x + \left(x^{2} - 2 x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x^{2}}{2} + x + \left(x^{2} - 2 x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)}\right) \]sumStart with the derivative of the entire function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x^{2}}{2}\right) + \frac{d}{d x} \left(x^{2} - 2 x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \]sumApply the sum rule to separate the terms.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x^{2}}{2}\right) + \frac{d}{d x} \left(x - 1\right)^{2} \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \]algebraSimplify the quadratic expression inside the parentheses.✓ Proved
- \[ = \left(x - 1\right)^{2} \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} + \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x - 1\right)^{2} + \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x^{2}}{2}\right) \]productApply the product rule to the third term.✓ Proved
- \[ = x + \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x - 1\right)^{2} + \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x^{2}}{2}\right) - 1 \]logarithmicDifferentiate the natural logarithm term.✓ Proved
- \[ = x + \left(2 x - 2\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} + \frac{d}{d x} x + \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{x^{2}}{2}\right) - 1 \]chainApply the chain rule to the power term.✓ Proved
- \[ = \left(2 x - 2\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \]power algebra algebraDifferentiate the power terms. Simplify the term (x-1)**2 / (x-1). Distribute the 2 in the product term.✓ Proved
- \[ = 2 x \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} - 2 \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \]algebraCombine like terms and simplify.✓ Proved
- \[ = \left(2 x - 2\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \]simplifyFinal simplified form.✓ Proved
Answer \( 2 \left(x - 1\right) \ln{\left(x - 1 \right)} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 10 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 11 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-20gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-20qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and algebraic simplifications. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the labels accurately reflect the operations performed.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-19 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules step-by-step. Each step changes only one aspect of the expression, and the labels accurately reflect the operations performed (sum, algebra, product, logarithmic, chain, power, simplify). The final result matches the stated answer.gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-19 — Step 6 incorrectly labels the derivative of (x-1)^2 as a "chain" rule application; it should be the "power" rule. The labeling misrepresents the rule used, which could mislead a student.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-20 with SymPy 1.14.0.