∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Power rule›Problem 2.2402

Derivative of \( \displaystyle 2 x^{2} - 12 x \)

Problem 2.2402 · medium Video

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = 2 x^{2} - 12 x \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x^{2} - 12 x\right) \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{d}{d x} 12 x + \frac{d}{d x} 2 x^{2} \]
    sumApply the sum rule.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - 12 \frac{d}{d x} x + 2 \frac{d}{d x} x^{2} \]
    constant-multipleApply the constant multiple rule.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = 4 x - 12 \]
    power simplifyDifferentiate the power terms. Simplify the expression.✓ Proved
Answer \( 4 x - 12 \)
Top: the graph of f = 2x² - 12x. A tangent line slides along it, and its slope is plotted below as it goes, tracing f' = 4x - 12.

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation. How we verify

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (6)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-18
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-18
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-16
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-16
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-15
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-15 — Step 4 applies the power rule to both terms in one line, violating the rule‑by‑rule granularity requirement. Each rule should be applied to a single term; a separate step for the second term would be needed.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-18 with SymPy 1.14.0.