∫Calc Practice

Average rate of change and secant lines

Problem 2.2207 · easy

Find the average rate of change of \( \displaystyle f(x) = 4 x^{2} + 3 x + 1 \) on \( \displaystyle [2, 5] \), and the equation of the secant line through the endpoints.
  1. \[ \left. 4 x^{2} + 3 x + 1 \right|_{\substack{ x=2 }} = 23 \]
    The value at the left endpoint.✓ Proved
  2. \[ \left. 4 x^{2} + 3 x + 1 \right|_{\substack{ x=5 }} = 116 \]
    The value at the right endpoint.✓ Proved
  3. \[ 31 \]
    Change in output over change in input.✓ Proved
  4. \[ 31 x - 39 \]
    Point-slope form through the left endpoint.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x} = 31,\quad y = 31 x - 39 \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0recomputed in floating point

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — The solution provides no explanatory sentences connecting the calculations to the problem statement. It fails to explicitly state the formula for average rate of change or how the secant line equation was derived, making it impossible to verify the logical steps or ensure the student understands the method.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-13
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-13 — The solution provides no explanatory sentences connecting the calculations to the problem statement. It fails to explicitly state the formula for average rate of change or how the secant line equation was derived, making it impossible to verify the logical steps or ensure the student understands the method.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-13
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (misleading) 2026-10-13 — The solution provides no text explaining how the average rate of change was calculated or how the secant line equation was derived, making it impossible to verify the logic or learn the method.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/secant_slope, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.