∫Calc Practice

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \ln{\left(\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \right)} \)

Problem 2.2167 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \ln{\left(\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \right)} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \right)} \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}}{\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule for the logarithm.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{\sec^{2}{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2}}{\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule for the tangent function.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{\sec^{2}{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}}{2 \tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]
    derivativeDifferentiate the inner function x/2.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{1}{2 \cos^{2}{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]
    algebraMultiply the terms together.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \frac{1}{2 \sin{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \cos{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]
    rewrite algebraRewrite tangent in terms of sine and cosine. Simplify the denominator.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{1}{\sin{\left(x \right)}} \]
    simplifyUse the double angle identity 2*sin(x/2)*cos(x/2) = sin(x).✓ Proved
  8. \[ = \csc{\left(x \right)} \]
    simplifyRewrite 1/sin(x) as csc(x).✓ Proved
Answer \( \csc{\left(x \right)} \)
Mind the domain. The answer is also defined at points where f(x) is not. Substituting there gives a number that is not a slope of f.

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(x/2) = 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(x/2) = 0
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(x/2) = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(x/2) = 0
undefined where cos(x/2) = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
undefined where tan(x/2) = 0
undefined where cos(x/2) = 0
undefined where sin(x/2) = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where sin(x/2) = 0
undefined where cos(x/2) = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where sin(x/2) = 0
undefined where cos(x/2) = 0
undefined where sin(x) = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where sin(x) = 0
csc has poles at multiples of pi
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
csc has poles at multiples of pi
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 3 applies two rules at once: it uses the derivative of tan and the chain rule for the inner function x/2, but labels it only as "chain". Each step must change only one thing and name the correct rule.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-13 — Step 3 applies two rules at once: it uses the derivative of tan and the chain rule for the inner function x/2, but labels it only as "chain". Each step must change only one thing and name the correct rule.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-13
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-13
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-13

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.