Derivative of \( \displaystyle \ln{\left(\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \right)} \)
Problem 2.2167 · hard
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \ln{\left(\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \right)} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \right)} \]derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}}{\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]chainApply the chain rule for the logarithm.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\sec^{2}{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \frac{x}{2}}{\tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]chainApply the chain rule for the tangent function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\sec^{2}{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}}{2 \tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]derivativeDifferentiate the inner function x/2.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{1}{2 \cos^{2}{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \tan{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]algebraMultiply the terms together.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{1}{2 \sin{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)} \cos{\left(\frac{x}{2} \right)}} \]rewrite algebraRewrite tangent in terms of sine and cosine. Simplify the denominator.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{1}{\sin{\left(x \right)}} \]simplifyUse the double angle identity 2*sin(x/2)*cos(x/2) = sin(x).✓ Proved
- \[ = \csc{\left(x \right)} \]simplifyRewrite 1/sin(x) as csc(x).✓ Proved
Answer \( \csc{\left(x \right)} \)
Mind the domain. The answer is also defined at points where f(x) is not. Substituting there gives a number that is not a slope of f.
Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 undefined where tan(x/2) = 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 undefined where tan(x/2) = 0 sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 undefined where tan(x/2) = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 sec has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 undefined where tan(x/2) = 0 undefined where cos(x/2) = 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2 undefined where tan(x/2) = 0 undefined where cos(x/2) = 0 undefined where sin(x/2) = 0 |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where sin(x/2) = 0 undefined where cos(x/2) = 0 |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where sin(x/2) = 0 undefined where cos(x/2) = 0 undefined where sin(x) = 0 |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where sin(x) = 0 csc has poles at multiples of pi |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 csc has poles at multiples of pi |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) — Step 3 applies two rules at once: it uses the derivative of tan and the chain rule for the inner function x/2, but labels it only as "chain". Each step must change only one thing and name the correct rule.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-13 — Step 3 applies two rules at once: it uses the derivative of tan and the chain rule for the inner function x/2, but labels it only as "chain". Each step must change only one thing and name the correct rule.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-13qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-13gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-13
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-13 with SymPy 1.14.0.