∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Chain rule›Problem 2.2145

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \)

Problem 2.2145 · hard

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \]
    constant-multipleStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \]
    rewritePull out the constant factor. Rewrite the square root as a power.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10\right)}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]
    chainApply the chain rule.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(16 x^{2} - 24 x\right)}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]
    constantDifferentiate the constant term 10.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{- \frac{d}{d x} 24 x + \frac{d}{d x} 16 x^{2}}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]
    sumSplit the derivative into terms.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \frac{32 x - 24}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]
    power algebraDifferentiate the power terms. Combine the terms into a single fraction.✓ Proved
  7. \[ = \frac{8 x - 6}{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]
    simplifySimplify the fraction by dividing by 4.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{8 x - 6}{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \)

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) — Step 2 is marked as 'unlabelled', which violates the contract that every step must name its rule from the fixed vocabulary (it should be 'constant-multiple'). Step 5 is labeled 'constant' but performs differentiation of a polynomial term, which is better described as 'sum' or 'derivative'; however, the unlabelled step is a clear defect.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-12
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-12 — Step 2 is marked as 'unlabelled', which violates the contract that every step must name its rule from the fixed vocabulary (it should be 'constant-multiple'). Step 5 is labeled 'constant' but performs differentiation of a polynomial term, which is better described as 'sum' or 'derivative'; however, the unlabelled step is a clear defect.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-12 — Step 5 incorrectly drops the constant term 10 from the inner function before differentiating. The derivative of 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 should be 32*x - 24; the step as written omits the constant and mislabels the operation.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-12 — Step 2 is marked as 'unlabelled', which violates the requirement that every step must name its rule from the fixed vocabulary (it should be 'constant-multiple'). Additionally, Step 5 is labeled 'constant' but performs differentiation of a polynomial, which is better described as 'sum' or 'derivative' depending on granularity, though the primary defect is the missing label in Step 2.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-12 with SymPy 1.14.0.