Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \)
Problem 2.2145 · hard
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \]constant-multipleStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}}{2} \]rewritePull out the constant factor. Rewrite the square root as a power.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10\right)}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]chainApply the chain rule.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(16 x^{2} - 24 x\right)}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]constantDifferentiate the constant term 10.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{- \frac{d}{d x} 24 x + \frac{d}{d x} 16 x^{2}}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]sumSplit the derivative into terms.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{32 x - 24}{4 \sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]power algebraDifferentiate the power terms. Combine the terms into a single fraction.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{8 x - 6}{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \]simplifySimplify the fraction by dividing by 4.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{8 x - 6}{\sqrt{16 x^{2} - 24 x + 10}} \)
Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0 |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0 |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0 |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0 |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0 |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 = 0 |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) — Step 2 is marked as 'unlabelled', which violates the contract that every step must name its rule from the fixed vocabulary (it should be 'constant-multiple'). Step 5 is labeled 'constant' but performs differentiation of a polynomial term, which is better described as 'sum' or 'derivative'; however, the unlabelled step is a clear defect.
Every verdict on record (4)
gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-12qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-12 — Step 2 is marked as 'unlabelled', which violates the contract that every step must name its rule from the fixed vocabulary (it should be 'constant-multiple'). Step 5 is labeled 'constant' but performs differentiation of a polynomial term, which is better described as 'sum' or 'derivative'; however, the unlabelled step is a clear defect.gpt-oss:20b: fail (error) 2026-10-12 — Step 5 incorrectly drops the constant term 10 from the inner function before differentiating. The derivative of 16*x**2 - 24*x + 10 should be 32*x - 24; the step as written omits the constant and mislabels the operation.qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (style) 2026-10-12 — Step 2 is marked as 'unlabelled', which violates the requirement that every step must name its rule from the fixed vocabulary (it should be 'constant-multiple'). Additionally, Step 5 is labeled 'constant' but performs differentiation of a polynomial, which is better described as 'sum' or 'derivative' depending on granularity, though the primary defect is the missing label in Step 2.
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-12 with SymPy 1.14.0.