Derivative of \( \displaystyle \ln{\left(\sin{\left(x \right)} \right)} \)
Problem 2.21 · hard
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \ln{\left(\sin{\left(x \right)} \right)} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(\sin{\left(x \right)} \right)} \]derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \sin{\left(x \right)}}{\sin{\left(x \right)}} \]chainApply the chain rule for the logarithm.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{\cos{\left(x \right)}}{\sin{\left(x \right)}} \]derivative algebraDifferentiate the inner function sin(x). Combine the fraction.✓ Proved
- \[ = \cot{\left(x \right)} \]simplifySimplify the ratio of cosine to sine.✓ Proved
Answer \( \cot{\left(x \right)} \)
Mind the domain. The answer is also defined at points where f(x) is not. Substituting there gives a number that is not a slope of f.
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments undefined where sin(x) = 0 |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where sin(x) = 0 |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where sin(x) = 0 |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 undefined where sin(x) = 0 cot has poles at multiples of pi |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 cot has poles at multiples of pi |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: passdeepseek-r1:70b: passqwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and standard derivatives, with each step changing only one aspect of the expression and using valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.
Every verdict on record (12)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and standard derivatives, with each step changing only one aspect of the expression and using valid labels from the fixed vocabulary.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and standard derivatives, with each step changing only one aspect of the expression. The labels used are from the allowed vocabulary and accurately describe the operations performed.gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-18deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-18gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-18gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-17deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-17
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.