∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Power rule›Problem 2.199

Derivative of \( \displaystyle \frac{2 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}}{3} \)

Problem 2.199 · medium

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = \frac{2 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}}{3} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \frac{2 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}}{3} \]
    derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = \frac{2 \frac{d}{d x} \sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}}{3} \]
    constant-multiple rewritePull out the constant factor. Rewrite the square root as a fractional exponent.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \left(\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1\right)}{3 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    chain algebraApply the chain rule. Simplify the constant coefficients.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{\left(6 x + 4\right) \frac{d}{d x} \left(3 x + 2\right)}{3 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    powerApply the power rule to the inner term.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{18 x + 12}{3 \sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    chain algebraApply the chain rule to the innermost term. Multiply the constants.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \frac{6 x + 4}{\sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \]
    algebra rewriteSimplify the expression. Rewrite the negative exponent as a denominator.✓ Proved
Answer \( \frac{2 \left(3 x + 2\right)}{\sqrt{\left(3 x + 2\right)^{2} + 1}} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where (3*x + 2)**2 + 1 = 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 7 labels the application of the derivative of 3*x+2 as "chain"; the correct label is "derivative" (or "constant-multiple" if one prefers).
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and algebraic simplifications in distinct steps. All labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
Every verdict on record (15)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and algebraic simplifications in distinct steps. All labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-20 — Step 7 labels the application of the derivative of 3*x+2 as "chain"; the correct label is "derivative" (or "constant-multiple" if one prefers).
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and constant multiple rule in distinct steps. The algebraic simplifications and rewrites are valid and clearly labeled.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19 — The solution correctly applies the chain rule and constant multiple rule in distinct steps. All labels accurately describe the transformations performed, and the algebraic simplifications are correct.
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-18
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-18
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-09-18 — Step 7 is labeled "chain" but it is simply the derivative of the linear function 3*x+2, which should be labeled "derivative". The step itself is correct, but the rule name is inaccurate.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-17
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-17

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.