∫Calc Practice

The derivative from the limit definition

Problem 2.1952 · medium

Use the limit definition of the derivative to find \( \displaystyle f'(x) \) for \( \displaystyle f(x) = 3 - \frac{4}{x} \).
  1. By definition f′(x) = lim_{h→0} [f(x + h) − f(x)]/h.
    Reviewed
  2. \[ 3 - \frac{4}{h + x} \]
    Write out f(x + h).✓ Proved
  3. \[ \frac{- \frac{4}{h + x} + \frac{4}{x}}{h} = \frac{4}{x \left(h + x\right)} \]
    Combine and cancel the factor h.✓ Proved
  4. \[ \lim_{h \to 0^+}\left(\frac{4}{x \left(h + x\right)}\right) = \frac{4}{x^{2}} \]
    Now h → 0 by direct substitution.✓ Proved
Answer \( f'(x) = \frac{4}{x^{2}} \)

Lines: 3 proved, 1 reviewed. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1Reviewedreviewers: gpt-oss:20b, qwen3.6:27b-mlxa sentence; read, not computed
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(lhs - rhs) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Checked independentlysympy 1.14.0 + mpmath 1.3.0matches the derivative by the power, quotient and chain rules

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass — The solution correctly applies the limit definition of the derivative, performs the algebraic simplification accurately, and evaluates the limit correctly.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-09
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-09 — The solution correctly applies the limit definition of the derivative, performs the algebraic simplification accurately, and evaluates the limit correctly.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-09 — Step 2 is incorrect because it only writes out f(x+h) but omits f(x) and the division by h required by the difference quotient in Step 1. Step 3 then performs algebra on an incomplete expression, making the derivation logically invalid.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-09

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by generator:structured/derivative_definition, checked 2026-10-09 with SymPy 1.14.0.