∫Calc Practice
Home›Calculus 1›Chain rule›Problem 2.187

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{\sqrt{2} e^{x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)}}{2} \)

Problem 2.187 · hard Beautiful

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{\sqrt{2} e^{x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)}}{2} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{\sqrt{2} e^{x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)}}{2}\right) \]
    Start with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{\sqrt{2} \frac{d}{d x} e^{x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)}}{2} \]
    constant-multiplePull out the constant factor.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - \frac{\sqrt{2} \left(e^{x} \frac{d}{d x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)} + \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)} \frac{d}{d x} e^{x}\right)}{2} \]
    productApply the product rule to the remaining terms.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = - \frac{\sqrt{2} \left(e^{x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)} + e^{x} \frac{d}{d x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)}\right)}{2} \]
    derivativeDifferentiate exp(x).✓ Proved
  5. \[ = - \frac{\sqrt{2} \left(- e^{x} \sin{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)} + e^{x} \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)}\right)}{2} \]
    trig algebraDifferentiate cos(x + pi/4). Simplify the expression inside the parentheses.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = - \frac{\sqrt{2} \left(- \sin{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)} + \cos{\left(x + \frac{\pi}{4} \right)}\right) e^{x}}{2} \]
    algebraFactor out exp(x).✓ Proved
  7. \[ = e^{x} \sin{\left(x \right)} \]
    rewrite algebra algebra simplify algebra algebra simplifyExpand the trigonometric terms using angle addition formulas. Substitute the value of cos(pi/4) and sin(pi/4). Distribute the values. Combine like terms inside the parentheses. Simplify the coefficient of sin(x). Multiply the negative signs. Simplify the final constant.✓ Proved
Answer \( e^{x} \sin{\left(x \right)} \)

✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
9✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
10✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
11✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
12✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
13✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
14✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: pass
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (15)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-20 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and trigonometric identities. Each step isolates a single transformation, and the labels accurately reflect the operations performed.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-20
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and trigonometric identities. Each step isolates a single operation, and the labels accurately reflect the transformations performed.
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-19
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-19
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-19
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-09-18 — The solution correctly applies differentiation rules and trigonometric identities in single-step transformations. All labels are appropriate for the operations performed.
  • deepseek-r1:70b: fail (error) 2026-09-18 — Step 1 lacks a rule label, violating the contract.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-18
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-09-17
  • deepseek-r1:70b: pass 2026-09-17

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-09-26 with SymPy 1.14.0.