Derivative of \( \displaystyle x - \left(x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \)
Problem 2.1827 · hard
Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = x - \left(x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \).
- \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(x - \left(x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)}\right) \]derivativeStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
- \[ = \frac{d}{d x} x - \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + 1\right) \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \]sumApply the difference rule.✓ Proved
- \[ = - \left(x + 1\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} - \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + 1\right) + \frac{d}{d x} x \]productApply the product rule to the second term.✓ Proved
- \[ = - \left(x + 1\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} - \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(x + 1\right) + 1 \]constantDifferentiate the first term.✓ Proved
- \[ = - \left(x + 1\right) \frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} - \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} + 1 \]derivativeDifferentiate the first part of the product rule.✓ Proved
- \[ = - \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \]derivative algebra algebra simplifyDifferentiate the second part of the product rule. Simplify the fraction. Distribute the negative sign. Combine like terms.✓ Proved
Answer \( - \ln{\left(x + 1 \right)} \)
✓ Nihil obstat Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. Reviewers found nothing wrong with the explanation.
The full receipt
| Line | Status | Checked by | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | line 1 is the problem as stated |
| 2 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 3 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 4 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 5 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 6 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 7 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 8 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| 9 | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0 log is undefined for non-positive arguments |
| answer, a second way | ✓ Proved | sympy 1.14.0 | SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer |
Reviewers
gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 4 incorrectly labels the differentiation of x as "constant"; the correct rule name would be "derivative".qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass
Every verdict on record (4)
qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-08gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-08 — Step 4 incorrectly labels the differentiation of x as "constant"; the correct rule name would be "derivative".gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-08qwen3.6:27b-mlx: pass 2026-10-08
Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate
method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence,
not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by
gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-08 with SymPy 1.14.0.