∫Calc Practice

Derivative of \( \displaystyle - \frac{\ln{\left(\cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{2} \)

Problem 2.1825 · hard Beautiful

Differentiate \( \displaystyle f(x) = - \frac{\ln{\left(\cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{2} \).
  1. \[ \frac{d}{d x} \left(- \frac{\ln{\left(\cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{2}\right) \]
    constant-multipleStart with the derivative of the function.✓ Proved
  2. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \ln{\left(\cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)} \right)}}{2} \]
    logarithmicApply the derivative rule for the logarithm.✓ Proved
  3. \[ = - \frac{\frac{d}{d x} \cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)}}{2 \cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)}} \]
    trigApply the derivative rule for the cosine function.✓ Proved
  4. \[ = \frac{\sin{\left(2 x - 3 \right)} \frac{d}{d x} \left(2 x - 3\right)}{2 \cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)}} \]
    derivativeApply the chain rule to the inner function.✓ Proved
  5. \[ = \frac{\sin{\left(2 x - 3 \right)}}{\cos{\left(2 x - 3 \right)}} \]
    algebra algebra simplifyDifferentiate the linear term 2*x - 3. Multiply the constants together. Simplify the expression by canceling terms.✓ Proved
  6. \[ = \tan{\left(2 x - 3 \right)} \]
    simplifyUse the tangent identity.✓ Proved
Answer \( \tan{\left(2 x - 3 \right)} \)
Mind the domain. The answer is also defined at points where f(x) is not. Substituting there gives a number that is not a slope of f.

Every line of this solution was proved by the computer algebra system SymPy. The answer was also checked a second way, without looking at the solution. The reviewers disagree about how one step is explained; every verdict is in the receipt.

The full receipt
LineStatusChecked byDetail
1✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0line 1 is the problem as stated
2✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
3✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
log is undefined for non-positive arguments
undefined where cos(2*x - 3) = 0
4✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where cos(2*x - 3) = 0
5✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where cos(2*x - 3) = 0
6✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where cos(2*x - 3) = 0
7✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where cos(2*x - 3) = 0
8✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
undefined where cos(2*x - 3) = 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
answer✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0final line against the stated answer: simplify(a - b) reduced to 0
tan has poles at odd multiples of pi/2
answer, a second way✓ Provedsympy 1.14.0SymPy differentiated f directly and got the stated answer

Reviewers

  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) — Step 4 applies both the derivative of cosine and the chain rule but is labeled only as "derivative"; step 5 differentiates a linear term yet is labeled "algebra". These labeling errors violate the single‑rule‑per‑step rule.
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) — Step 1 is labeled 'constant-multiple' but performs no operation; it merely restates the problem. Step 2 is labeled 'logarithmic' but performs the constant-multiple rule (pulling out 1/2) and the logarithmic derivative rule simultaneously, violating the one-rule-per-step constraint.
Every verdict on record (4)
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-08 — Step 1 is labeled 'constant-multiple' but performs no operation; it merely restates the problem. Step 2 is labeled 'logarithmic' but performs the constant-multiple rule (pulling out 1/2) and the logarithmic derivative rule simultaneously, violating the one-rule-per-step constraint.
  • gpt-oss:20b: fail (style) 2026-10-08 — Step 4 applies both the derivative of cosine and the chain rule but is labeled only as "derivative"; step 5 differentiates a linear term yet is labeled "algebra". These labeling errors violate the single‑rule‑per‑step rule.
  • gpt-oss:20b: pass 2026-10-08
  • qwen3.6:27b-mlx: fail (error) 2026-10-08 — Step 1 is labeled 'constant-multiple' but performs no operation; it merely restates the problem. Step 2 is labeled 'logarithmic' but performs the constant-multiple rule (pulling out 1/2), not the logarithmic derivative rule. Step 3 is labeled 'trig' but applies the chain rule for the logarithm, not a trigonometric derivative rule.

Proved: SymPy reduced the difference between the two sides to zero. Checked independently: a separate method, named above, confirmed it. Checked numerically: the two sides agree at every sampled point, which is evidence, not proof. Reviewed: a model or a person read it; that is all a sentence can have. Solution by gemma4:26b, checked 2026-10-08 with SymPy 1.14.0.